We grew up in Beacon Hill, in the kind of Boston world where expectations felt structural—built into the brick facades, donor walls, and old names spoken like inheritance. My mother, Eleanor Harper, was a renowned pediatric surgeon. My father, William Harper, was a senior partner at one of Boston’s oldest law firms. They were polished, accomplished, and deeply invested in visible success. My older brother James fit that world perfectly. He was three years older, brilliant in all the approved ways, and seemed to move through life with effortless precision. Straight A’s, debate trophies, leadership roles—he was the child who made the Harper system look flawless.

I was different in a way my family never knew what to do with. I wasn’t unintelligent. If anything, that made things worse. I asked too many questions, challenged too many assumptions, and cared less about mastering systems than understanding how to rebuild them. While James memorized information and returned it beautifully, I wanted to know why the system existed at all—and whether it could be better. My third-grade teacher once called me “innovatively disruptive.” My father called that a polite way of saying difficult.